|
Home / Legal
Software Companies Face Threat of Patent Infringement Suits for Overseas Sales: But Is It Serious
By:Robert Masud
A significant case has reached the U.S. Supreme Court that on the surface could expose high-tech companies to greater liability for patent infringement in regard to certain products assembled and sold overseas. However, based on the tenor of the comments and questions by a majority of the Justices of the Court during oral arguments, it appears that there will be no major shift in policy in regard to patent infringement when a product is assembled and sold off the shores of the United States.
Historically, U.S. companies could escape liability for manufacturing and selling products that produced and sold in the U.S. would constitute actionable patent infringement with no negative consequences. However, all of this may change when the U.S. Supreme Court hands down a decision in the seminal case of Microsoft Corporation v. AT&T Corp. The issue in this case is the actual scope of the exception to the rule imposing liability for patent infringement. That exception had permitted an entity or individual to avoid a patent infringement suit components for a patented invention were supplied to an assembler in another country, provided the final product was sold in another country.
AT&T is arguing in the case before the nation's highest court that Microsoft is doing just that by causing that company's digital speech processor technology to be assembled and sold in another country. Microsoft is countering that no component as contemplated by the law is involved. Rather, Microsoft contends that only instructions directing the computer how to perform the digital speech processing are included in the Microsoft package being assembled and sold overseas. Microsoft maintains that AT&T needs to obtain foreign patents to protect its interests.
During oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court, Justices Souter and Bryer both expressed concern that a ruling in favor of AT&T would expose many high-tech enterprises to liability under the U.S. patent infringement laws.
The only apparent support for AT&T's position during the oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court came from Justice Kennedy. He said that he did have sympathy for the AT&T position regarding the component issue that was raised before the Court. The Chief Justice has recused himself from the case.
If you are interested in keeping abreast of the latest developments in the world of business, finance and the internet, you can easily sign up to receive our alerts and legal updates that we provide with regularity. Subscribe to our alerts and legal updates today to keep up to date on all of the important issues that effect your life and your business.
Digg
del.icio.us
Blink
Stumble
Spurl
Reddit
Netscape
Furl
Article keywords: international business law, business law, internet law, patent infringement
Article Source: http://www.articles2k.com
Robert Masud, Esq. is the principal of Masud & Company LLC, a law firm for the world of business, finance and the internet. Find out how we can help you at http://www.masudco.com
|
|
| Top Legal Articles |
- 1). how to defer jury duty By : Phil Wiley
Let’s face it. Jury duty can be a drag, but most of all it’s not always convenient when we’re called up to service. So how can you defer jury duty?
|
|
|
- 3). The New Bankruptcy “Means Test” Explained in Plain English By : Charles J. Phelan
With the new bankruptcy law in effect as of October 17, 2005, there is a lot of confusion regarding the new "means test" requirement. The means test will be used by the courts to determine eligibility for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The purpose of this article is to explain in plain language how the means test works, so that consumers can get a better idea of how they will be affected under the new rules.
|
- 4). Estate Planning - No Contest Clause in your Will By : Ronald Hudkins
Copyright 2006 Ronald Hudkins
There is value in the story of an older client who had seen a very interesting clause employed in a will. There was a great deal of money at stake and the many family members had little reason to love each other, because they had never met and never knew of each other’s existence. It was expected that the will would be heavily contested on several different fronts in every conceivable way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| New Legal Articles |
- 1). Personal Injury Compensation Claims By : Julian Hall
Not all accidents lead to legal proceedings, however if there are no serious injuries, you may be entitled to recover damages for property and other expenses from the third party. The likelihood of legal proceedings will usually rest on the quantum, or the amount of financial damage which has ensued from the accident.
|
|
|
- 3). California Contractor License Bond By : Seth Miller
Before a contractor can receive a contractor’s license in California, the contractor must register with the California Contractors State License Board and pay a Contractor's License Bond or a cash credit.
In the event of a contractor's license getting suspended or annulled due to a breach of the Contractors License Law, the contractor must file a disciplinary bond with the CSLB.
|
- 4). Montana Child Support the Treasure State By : Holcy
Montana Child Support
How do you know if you qualify for child support? Child support is available to all single parents in need of financial assistance from the non-custodial parent. In order to receive child support services, you must first fill out an application with the state of Montana. When apply for child support, there will be a non-refundable application fee.
|
- 5). Criminal background check By : Stanley Alpin
Background checks are a useful screening and selection tool for companies. Of the many types of background checks, criminal background checks are routinely carried out by employers to ensure that they are not courting a risk of physical and mental trauma. In fact, in several states in the U.S, criminal background checks are compulsory for prospects who apply for positions in places such as nursing homes, educational institutions, and adult care centers.
|
- 6). Employment background check By : Stanley Alpin
Employment background checks are becoming increasingly common these days. The reasons for this include the fact that negligent hiring lawsuits that result from the actions of an errant employee can damage a company’s credibility and lead to hefty fines; companies have become more selective in their choice of employees following the threat of terrorist activities; accepting a resume at face value has resulted in many companies wasting time and money due to frequent hire-and-fire situations.
|
- 7). How an employee background check works By : Stanley Alpin
Over the past few years pre-employment background checks have gained significance for employers big and small. Companies can either execute the required activities in-house or can outsource them to human resource companies that specialize in carrying out background checks.
There is a lot of paper-work, co-coordination, and follow-up that goes into conducting a background check and for this reasons companies prefer to get the job done by an outside agency.
|
- 8). Is an instant background check even possible? By : Stanley Alpin
Given that there are more than 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States and that information on U.S citizens is scattered across various databases all over 3,142 counties, it is safe to conclude that an instant background check is not possible at present. Yet, there are innumerable companies that purportedly offer instant background checks.
|
- 9). What shows up on a criminal record background check? By : Stanley Alpin
A criminal record background check can throw up a lot of information on an individual including previous arrests as well as conviction and non-conviction information. The information is obtained from Federal Fugitive files, files from the Department of Corrections prison, state criminal records, databases on sex offenders, and prison parole records.
|
- 10). Offshore Trust - Effective Estate Planning, You Decide By : Ronald Hudkins
Copyright 2006 Ronald Hudkins
The creation of offshore trusts and other financial plans is a way of shielding your assets from the laws of the nation in which you reside. It can sometimes be used to remove one of the two certainties of life; taxes. Americans are far less likely than the citizens of other countries to put assets abroad because, although when you receive the benefits of being free of your country’s laws regarding assets (namely taxation) you also lose the aspect of those laws that are designed to protect your assets.
|
|
|